<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>What Would Jennifer Do</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.whatwouldjenniferdo.com/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.whatwouldjenniferdo.com</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 16 Feb 2012 15:09:53 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Caffeine Optimization</title>
		<link>http://www.whatwouldjenniferdo.com/2012/02/caffeine-optimization/</link>
		<comments>http://www.whatwouldjenniferdo.com/2012/02/caffeine-optimization/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 Feb 2012 15:09:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>jenniferdaniel</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[businessweek]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Illustration]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.whatwouldjenniferdo.com/?p=1862</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Now that BusinessWeek is blogging, I’m also doing some illustrations for the internet. Today, your morning Coffee App.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.businessweek.com/technology/how-to-drink-your-coffee-theres-an-app-for-that-02162012.html"><img class="alignnone" title="Coffee Cup" src="http://24.media.tumblr.com/tumblr_lzhr3ca3kk1r5x33so1_r1_500.jpg" alt="" width="500" height="294" /></a></p>
<p>Now that BusinessWeek is blogging, I’m also doing some illustrations for the internet. Today, your morning <a href="http://www.businessweek.com/technology/how-to-drink-your-coffee-theres-an-app-for-that-02162012.html">Coffee App</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.whatwouldjenniferdo.com/2012/02/caffeine-optimization/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Facebook IPOs</title>
		<link>http://www.whatwouldjenniferdo.com/2012/02/facebook-ipos/</link>
		<comments>http://www.whatwouldjenniferdo.com/2012/02/facebook-ipos/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 20:52:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>jenniferdaniel</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[businessweek]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[infographics]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.whatwouldjenniferdo.com/?p=1858</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Quickie graphic with Karen Weise this week on Facebook&#8217;s IPO and what to expect next. The original here.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Quickie graphic with Karen Weise this week on Facebook&#8217;s IPO and what to expect next.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/bizweekdesign/6846805123/in/photostream/lightbox/"><img class="alignnone" src="http://farm8.staticflickr.com/7056/6846805123_8a6899dfa3_b.jpg" alt="" width="500" height="355" /></a></p>
<p>The original <a href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/bizweekdesign/6846805123/in/photostream/lightbox/">here</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.whatwouldjenniferdo.com/2012/02/facebook-ipos/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Plane Sex</title>
		<link>http://www.whatwouldjenniferdo.com/2012/02/plane-sex/</link>
		<comments>http://www.whatwouldjenniferdo.com/2012/02/plane-sex/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Feb 2012 20:17:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>jenniferdaniel</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[businessweek]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Illustration]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.whatwouldjenniferdo.com/?p=1850</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Fact: is required by information graphics law, that every graphics designer loves airplane safety cards. I drew a few myself this week… but why are you looking at my illustrations when you could be gazing into the eyes of two copulating planes?]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Fact: is required by information graphics law, that every graphics designer loves <a href="http://www.google.com/search?q=airplane+safety+cards&amp;oe=utf-8&amp;rls=org.mozilla:en-US:official&amp;client=firefox-a&amp;um=1&amp;ie=UTF-8&amp;hl=en&amp;tbm=isch&amp;source=og&amp;sa=N&amp;tab=wi&amp;ei=9TMsT_zaJOLl0QGDm5WUCw&amp;biw=1048&amp;bih=766&amp;sei=9zMsT67ZHerZ0QHQq9TSCg">airplane safety cards</a>.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/bizweekdesign/6807182733/in/set-72157625142355829/lightbox/"><img class="alignnone" title="Marriage at 30,000 Feet" src="http://farm8.staticflickr.com/7021/6807182733_65affd82df.jpg" alt="" width="500" height="333" /></a></p>
<p>I drew a few myself this week… but why are you looking at my illustrations when you could be gazing into the eyes of two <a href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/bizweekdesign/6806776681/in/photostream/lightbox/">copulating planes</a>?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.whatwouldjenniferdo.com/2012/02/plane-sex/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Inkling</title>
		<link>http://www.whatwouldjenniferdo.com/2012/01/inkling/</link>
		<comments>http://www.whatwouldjenniferdo.com/2012/01/inkling/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Jan 2012 20:34:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>jenniferdaniel</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Process]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.whatwouldjenniferdo.com/?p=1829</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I got an inkling! I have no idea what I&#8217;m going to do with it! &#160;]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://farm8.staticflickr.com/7154/6772448001_91b8dae406_b.jpg"><img class="alignnone" title="Garfield Fan Art" src="http://farm8.staticflickr.com/7154/6772448001_91b8dae406.jpg" alt="" width="471" height="500" /></a></p>
<p>I got an <a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fXbBA1DRE84">inkling</a>! I have no idea what I&#8217;m going to do with it!</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.whatwouldjenniferdo.com/2012/01/inkling/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Code Academy</title>
		<link>http://www.whatwouldjenniferdo.com/2012/01/code-academy/</link>
		<comments>http://www.whatwouldjenniferdo.com/2012/01/code-academy/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Jan 2012 15:30:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>jenniferdaniel</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[businessweek]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Illustration]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.whatwouldjenniferdo.com/?p=1820</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[My New Year&#8217;s resolution is to spend more time online and less time outside and I got a binary joke in the magazine this week for a story on Code Academy. Where&#8217;s my certificate of nerd authenticity?]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img class="alignnone" src="http://farm8.staticflickr.com/7170/6763178123_c2db56b998.jpg" alt="" width="500" height="375" /></p>
<p>My New Year&#8217;s resolution is to spend more time online and less time outside and I got a binary joke<a href="http://www.businessweek.com/magazine/computer-coding-not-for-geeks-only-01262012.html"> in the magazine</a> this week for a story on Code Academy. Where&#8217;s my certificate of nerd authenticity?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.whatwouldjenniferdo.com/2012/01/code-academy/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Amazon&#8217;s Hitman</title>
		<link>http://www.whatwouldjenniferdo.com/2012/01/amazons-hitman/</link>
		<comments>http://www.whatwouldjenniferdo.com/2012/01/amazons-hitman/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Jan 2012 19:28:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>jenniferdaniel</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[businessweek]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.whatwouldjenniferdo.com/?p=1813</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Who doesn&#8217;t love the stipple portraits in the WSJ? You? Really!? Then you haven&#8217;t seen Laura Holder&#8217;s tumblr, &#8220;As Seen in the WSJ&#8220;. Salami, crystal ball, sunchips, Snookie, they cover it all. That&#8217;s why this week I was so glad to finally have an excuse to work with the one and only Kevin Sprouls to [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://farm8.staticflickr.com/7173/6766836365_3b1fa115d2_b.jpg"><img class="alignnone" title="Amazon's Hitman" src="http://farm8.staticflickr.com/7173/6766836365_3b1fa115d2.jpg" alt="" width="500" height="324" /></a></p>
<p><a href="http://farm8.staticflickr.com/7160/6766843753_13a69d5770_b.jpg"><img class="alignnone" src="http://farm8.staticflickr.com/7160/6766843753_13a69d5770.jpg" alt="" width="500" height="328" /></a></p>
<p><a href="http://farm8.staticflickr.com/7023/6766841293_cd735163b8_b.jpg"><img class="alignnone" src="http://farm8.staticflickr.com/7023/6766841293_cd735163b8.jpg" alt="" width="500" height="324" /></a></p>
<p>Who doesn&#8217;t love the stipple portraits in the WSJ? You? Really!? Then you haven&#8217;t seen Laura Holder&#8217;s tumblr, &#8220;<a href="http://asseeninwsj.tumblr.com/">As Seen in the WSJ</a>&#8220;. Salami, crystal ball, sunchips, Snookie, they cover it all.</p>
<p>That&#8217;s why this week I was so glad to finally have an excuse to work with the one and only <a href="http://sprouls.com/">Kevin Sprouls</a> to create this GIANT STIPPLE of Larry Kirshbaum (above). What&#8217;s black and white and on FIIIIREEEEEEEE?!</p>
<p><a href="http://www.businessweek.com/magazine/amazons-hit-man-01252012.html">Story here.</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.whatwouldjenniferdo.com/2012/01/amazons-hitman/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>MIT Family Tree</title>
		<link>http://www.whatwouldjenniferdo.com/2012/01/mit_familytree/</link>
		<comments>http://www.whatwouldjenniferdo.com/2012/01/mit_familytree/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Jan 2012 16:21:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>jenniferdaniel</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[businessweek]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[infographics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Process]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.whatwouldjenniferdo.com/?p=1824</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[BEFORE: AFTER: It seems I do a network chart about once a month. Really pleased how this one came together in all of 12 hours.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>BEFORE:<br />
<a href="http://farm8.staticflickr.com/7158/6771375569_f5a03b5806_b.jpg"><img class="alignnone" title="MIT Social network" src="http://farm8.staticflickr.com/7158/6771375569_f5a03b5806.jpg" alt="" width="500" height="372" /></a></p>
<p>AFTER:<br />
<a href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/bizweekdesign/6723028457/in/photostream/lightbox/"><img class="alignnone" title="MIT Social Network" src="http://farm8.staticflickr.com/7153/6723028457_a80d65d9f4_z.jpg" alt="" width="514" height="640" /></a></p>
<p>It seems I do a network chart about once a month. Really pleased how this one came together in all of 12 hours.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.whatwouldjenniferdo.com/2012/01/mit_familytree/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>I Disclose…Nothing</title>
		<link>http://www.whatwouldjenniferdo.com/2012/01/i-disclose%e2%80%a6nothing/</link>
		<comments>http://www.whatwouldjenniferdo.com/2012/01/i-disclose%e2%80%a6nothing/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Jan 2012 01:55:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>jenniferdaniel</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Illustration]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[New York Times]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.whatwouldjenniferdo.com/?p=1805</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I wrote and designed today&#8217;s cover illustration for NYT&#8217;s Sunday Review. It is hard to miss. It is a giant yellow disclaimer. Thanks Aviva Michaelov for this assignment! It was a lot of fun to make. Anyone who has shared a studio with me knows I am borderline obsessed with contract-speak. Also, I haven&#8217;t had to kern [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://farm8.staticflickr.com/7033/6812806097_b8e5dd788c_o.jpg"><img class="alignnone" src="http://farm8.staticflickr.com/7173/6749993319_b0f440c9c5_b.jpg" alt="" width="557" height="1000" /></a></p>
<p>I wrote and designed <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2012/01/22/sunday-review/hard-truths-about-disclosure.html?ref=opinion">today&#8217;s cover</a> illustration for NYT&#8217;s Sunday Review. It is hard to miss. It is a giant yellow disclaimer.</p>
<p>Thanks Aviva Michaelov for this assignment! It was a lot of fun to make. Anyone who has shared a studio with me knows I am borderline obsessed with contract-speak. Also, I haven&#8217;t had to kern this hard since college.</p>
<p>Click here for legible <a href="http://farm8.staticflickr.com/7033/6812806097_b8e5dd788c_o.jpg">high res</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.whatwouldjenniferdo.com/2012/01/i-disclose%e2%80%a6nothing/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>BBW 50. Don&#8217;t Google it.</title>
		<link>http://www.whatwouldjenniferdo.com/2012/01/bbw-50-dont-google-it/</link>
		<comments>http://www.whatwouldjenniferdo.com/2012/01/bbw-50-dont-google-it/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Jan 2012 22:13:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>jenniferdaniel</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[businessweek]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[infographics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Process]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.whatwouldjenniferdo.com/?p=1777</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[This week&#8217;s issue includes our second annual HIGHLY ANTICIPATED BBW50 TOP PERFORMING COMPANIES. Since this data is unique to Bloomberg I thought I&#8217;d explain some of the process that went into visualizing the data. The BBW 50 is an evaluation of the S&#38;P 500 companies based on four factors: 1-year risk-adjusted returns as of Dec. 31, [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img class="alignnone" title="BBW 50" src="http://farm8.staticflickr.com/7017/6716867857_e3793dd7e3_z.jpg" alt="" width="449" height="640" /><br />
This week&#8217;s issue includes our second annual HIGHLY ANTICIPATED BBW50 TOP PERFORMING COMPANIES.</p>
<p>Since this data is unique to Bloomberg I thought I&#8217;d explain some of the process that went into visualizing the data.</p>
<p>The BBW 50 is an evaluation of the S&amp;P 500 companies based on four factors:</p>
<ul>
<li>1-year risk-adjusted returns as of Dec. 31, 2011</li>
<li>5-year risk-adjusted returns as of  Dec. 31, 2011</li>
<li>Consensus analyst recommendations</li>
<li>Projected earnings growth</li>
</ul>
<div>
<p>The math that went into deciding these scores was computed by Bloomberg Rankings so I can&#8217;t get into much detail about that but each category has a potential score of 500 with a total potential perfect score of 2,000.</p>
</div>
<div>
<p>In a rare gatefold, we dedicated four pages to visualizing these four factors. Because the total scores for each of these 50 companies doesn&#8217;t vary much from company to company it doesn&#8217;t create a very dynamic chart to look at; however, the individual factors that make up the totals swing up and down per company. Using a simple stacked bar chart you&#8217;re able to individually compare one company to the next.</p>
</div>
<div><a href="http://farm8.staticflickr.com/7020/6710101615_0c5ffbddcd_b.jpg"><img title="BBW 50 Consumer Brands" src="http://farm8.staticflickr.com/7020/6710101615_0c5ffbddcd.jpg" alt="" width="500" height="398" /><br />
</a>Thank you excel.&nbsp;</p>
</div>
<p><strong> </strong></p>
<p><strong> </strong></p>
<p><strong> </strong></p>
<p><strong> </strong></p>
<p><strong> </strong></p>
<p><strong> </strong></p>
<p><strong> </strong></p>
<p><strong> </strong></p>
<p><strong> </strong></p>
<div><img class="alignnone" src="http://farm8.staticflickr.com/7004/6710175137_bf372a9ae8.jpg" alt="" width="500" height="115" /></div>
<div>I&#8217;m not entirely sure what the purpose of this screenshot from illustrator serves other than to show that from Excel, I output the graph to illustrator, expand, contract, and plop it into InDesign. Which you can see, is where it really takes shape.</div>
<div>
<p><strong><br />
</strong></p>
<p><strong> </strong></p>
<p><strong> </strong></p>
<p><strong> </strong></p>
<p><strong> </strong></p>
<p><strong> </strong></p>
<p><strong> </strong></p>
<p><strong> </strong></p>
<p><strong> </strong></p>
<p><strong></p>
<div><strong><a href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/bizweekdesign/6723028435/in/photostream/lightbox/"><img class="alignnone" title="BBW50" src="http://farm8.staticflickr.com/7175/6716868449_17b5af412e.jpg" alt="" width="500" height="180" /></a></strong></div>
<p></strong><strong> </strong><strong> </strong><strong> </strong><strong> </strong><strong> </strong><strong> </strong><strong> </strong><strong> </strong></p>
</div>
<p>In addition to annotations for a few select companies this feature includes brief interviews with CEOs from Chipotle, BiogenIdec, and Coca-Cola so it doesn&#8217;t just become some big data dump.</p>
<p>This left us with the back page. Though I had blown our ratings-data-wad on the gatefold I still had a spreadsheet full of performance based numbers. Along with editors John Tozzi and David Rocks, we tried a variation of a few indicators.</p>
<p><strong><img class="alignnone" src="http://farm8.staticflickr.com/7018/6710169307_4f90a43aab.jpg" alt="" width="500" height="410" /></strong></p>
<p>At first it seemed obvious to use 1-year and 5-year risk-adjusted returns… and that&#8217;s because it is obvious. Above, 5-year (red) was always bigger than 1-year (blue) which is terribly boring and more importantly, priceline.com (our number 2 ranked company) dwarfed our top rated company, Mastercard. That would be a terrible way to conclude the feature.</p>
<p>Once we got sales figures from the past year it was clear that this would make an interesting metric to test our ranking. You start to see the BBW50 rankings reward consistent growth over sheer size.</p>
<p><a href="http://farm8.staticflickr.com/7143/6710101083_eb14447a06_b.jpg"><img class="alignnone" title="Excel Scatter Plot" src="http://farm8.staticflickr.com/7143/6710101083_eb14447a06.jpg" alt="" width="500" height="374" /></a><br />
I love excel. And contrary to these screenshots, I do use WindowsExcel thanks to the pied piper of Gateway computers, Evan Applegate. Unfortunately, not even WindowsExcel can handle detailed scatter plots. Sure, it can show me a pattern or outliers, as it does above. But I have NO IDEA which company is which. And, until I learn R or can write in action script I am left with googling &#8220;scatter plot excel labels&#8221; and low and behold, a script exists to do such a trick.</p>
<p><a href="http://farm8.staticflickr.com/7025/6710100717_a5258f06c8_b.jpg"><img class="alignnone" title="Scatter plot EXcel" src="http://farm8.staticflickr.com/7025/6710100717_a5258f06c8.jpg" alt="" width="500" height="374" /><br />
</a>Made by <a href="http://www.clear-lines.com/blog/post/Excel-ScatterPlot-with-labels-colors-and-markers.aspx">Marthias Brandewinder </a>it magically outputs everything with labels and even lets me code company by sector.</p>
<p>As an added bonus I layered on predicted percent changes in earnings per share for each company. Though, the variation here isn&#8217;t dramatic you immediately get a sense for which company has the best potential to boost profits. I&#8217;m looking at you, Cabot Oil &amp; Gas.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/bizweekdesign/6723028445/in/photostream/lightbox/"><img class="alignnone" src="http://farm8.staticflickr.com/7008/6716869113_ca154a8c77.jpg" alt="" width="500" height="630" /></a><br />
A skew here, a gradient there, and suddenly you have a sexy S&amp;P 500 centerfold.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.whatwouldjenniferdo.com/2012/01/bbw-50-dont-google-it/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Tiny Drawings are Not Icons</title>
		<link>http://www.whatwouldjenniferdo.com/2012/01/tiny-drawings-are-not-icons/</link>
		<comments>http://www.whatwouldjenniferdo.com/2012/01/tiny-drawings-are-not-icons/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Jan 2012 13:24:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>jenniferdaniel</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[businessweek]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Illustration]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.whatwouldjenniferdo.com/?p=1756</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I was going to make this a pretty detailed post about art directing at a magazine and how it&#8217;s not about hiring 12 individual illustrations—it&#8217;s about how all of the artwork relates to one another as a reading experience but I don&#8217;t think I&#8217;m up for an educational post. I don&#8217;t feel like I have [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img class="alignnone" src="http://farm8.staticflickr.com/7153/6803623983_fed463ea3e.jpg" alt="" width="500" height="335" /><br />
I was going to make this a pretty detailed post about art directing at a magazine and how it&#8217;s not about hiring 12 individual illustrations—it&#8217;s about how all of the artwork relates to one another as a reading experience but I don&#8217;t think I&#8217;m up for an educational post. I don&#8217;t feel like I have the authority to remind other illustrators of this when I forget about it myself.</p>
<p><img title="Behind Every Great Woman" src="http://farm8.staticflickr.com/7160/6636925781_fab82b9587_b.jpg" alt="" width="578" height="940" /></p>
<p>You see, most illustrators are working in a vacuum… even though their artwork won&#8217;t be. The rare art director will share a layout with you, the illustrator, and work collaboratively. That is great– really great. Still, illustrators have no idea what comes before and after their illustration in a 70 page magazine. Usually, that&#8217;s not something the freelance artist has to worry about… unless of course if what comes before or after your artwork looks similar to your sketches. It&#8217;s these very special moments when that art director inexplicably rules out your *favorite idea* for another sketch. Whatabitch.</p>
<p>Such was the case the other week for Businesweek&#8217;s <a href="http://www.businessweek.com/magazine/behind-every-great-woman-01042012.html">Stay at home Dad</a> feature story. Originally, I created a series of detailed characters I was rather excited about. Normally, I don&#8217;t get so detailed and this new set of icons had a lot of personality. Unfortunately, BusinessWeek was also running other <a href="http://www.businessweek.com/magazine/wilbur-ross-the-bank-eater-01052012.html">small ornate drawings on the previous pages</a>. So, in an effort to create more contrast between these two features my tiny illustrations were reduced to something more bold, graphic and designerly: ICONS. Not to be confused with tiny drawings.</p>
<p><img class="alignnone" title="jennifer daniel icons" src="http://farm8.staticflickr.com/7146/6636598107_3f64c39300_o.jpg" alt="" width="500" height="2051" /></p>
<p>In the end, the graphic icons are much better but I still mourn the loss of the detailed man sewing.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.whatwouldjenniferdo.com/2012/01/tiny-drawings-are-not-icons/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

